intersect . . . invisible images

[J. Landman Gay]

I'm not sure why the explanation would be difficult. Existence is different 
from appearance. Intersect looks for existence at a particular location, 
visibility is how the object looks.

Substitute "blue" for "visible" and it's the same thing.


On July 14, 2017 5:03:09 AM Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> It does seem illogical that while one can set levels of transparency
> with interset
> an image can continue intersecting with another when it is, supposedly,
> invisible . . .
>
> Certainly, having to explain THAT to children is going to make them take
> an even
> more dim view of adults than I hope they do already.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com