Project Browser

RM richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Thu May 26 07:33:36 CEST 2016


Well, I apologise if I got that one wrong: about the Application Browser 
being EOL.

I was not trying to distort reality, and I know I am not Steve Jobs, and 
am very glad I'm not:
and there are 2 ways of interpreting "Kevin is not Steve Jobs", and I 
meant that to be a
positive statement, not the other way round.

However, note Jacque's "lumpier" comment.

Richmond.

On 26.05.2016 05:11, Mike Kerner wrote:
> Since the PB and the AB are both written in straight-up LC, why not try
> working on them?  No LCB required.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Kay C Lan <lan.kc.macmail at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And Richmond you aren't Steve either, your distortion reality field
>> only extends to you.
>>
>> So no matter how often you try to completely distort reality, it isn't
>> working. Your statement about LC EOLing the AB is a straight out
>> misrepresentation of the facts which you are fully aware of because
>> you participated in a recent long thread about the AB in which:
>>
>> Peter Brett stated on 26Nov15:
>>
>>> *Everything* shipped with LiveCode is supported.  If we don't intend to
>> support it, we don't ship it.
>>
>> Which seems pretty clear but you Richmond replied that you interpreted
>> this statement as a indication that LC had 'downgraded' the
>> Application Browser.
>>
>> Mark Weider on 27Nov15:
>>> Actually, I don't see that as a downgrade at all.
>>> Making it a plugin allows it to be more malleable, fixable, replaceable.
>> Taking it out
>>> of the IDE hierarchy should give us more options to work on the
>> Application
>>> Browser. Since the team wants to do other things, it's up to the
>> community to fix the
>>> AB, and making it a plugin makes it easier to do so.
>> Which didn't seem to penetrate your distortion field as you Richmond
>> concluded:
>>
>>> Aah, so the team isn't going to bother to listen to the Community because
>> it wants to
>>> do other things; so it is chucking the Application Browser out to grass.
>> So this is where you and only you have concluded that the AB is EOL.
>>
>> You also wrote:
>>
>>> Makes me wonder, again, again, about that word: "community".
>> So yes, if YOU as part of the community are completely unprepared to
>> modify/improve the AB, then it may remain stagnant, AND if YOU decide
>> to take the AB out of the Plugins folder and place it in the Trash
>> then yes, in YOUR world the AB is EOL.
>>
>> So here's my distorted version of reality. If no one from the
>> community touches the AB, then it must be PERFECT and so it'll remain
>> in the Plugins Folder forever. How lucky we are!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
>
>




More information about the use-livecode mailing list