Positive Infinity forever

dunbarx at aol.com dunbarx at aol.com
Fri May 13 16:46:19 EDT 2016

Leave it to Hermann to pledge 2^(2^7)


-----Original Message-----
From: [-hh] <hh at hh.on-rev.com>
To: use-revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Sent: Fri, May 13, 2016 4:04 pm
Subject: Re: Positive Infinity forever

Richard H. wrote
> Well, which infinity?  aleph-naught (A0) is the count of the
> integers/wholes/natural A1=2^A0, the count of the reals. 

Craig N. wrote:
> can it handle infinity^infinity? Of course, you need unicode
to display the answer.

Richard, I mean A0, and yes
Craig, A0 and A1 are members of Unicode.

For the advanced computation rules Richard cited, Kevin has first
to introduce the "LiveCode continuum hypothesis". Perhaps right
after the pledge is done?

For the moment it is good enough that the integer 8 is followed
by aleph zero (A0). Let him a possibility for stepping up, I am
willing to accept the LC continuum hypothesis, that is to back
one more pledge. But NOT 2^myLastPledge (which would be

Richard H.
> Yes, I really took a course  on that, from the master
> himself (Halmos)
He was one of the greatest. Hope his lectures were as excellent
as his books (but I read only three of these).

View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Positive-Infinity-forever-tp4704632p4704642.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list