Open source, closed source, and the value of code
irog at mac.com
Tue Mar 1 03:52:32 CET 2016
Well, what I suggested a few posts back was a license for non-profits and give-away apps. But, I completely understand if that turns out to be difficult to police. I’m only trying to help here!
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 7:45 PM, J. Landman Gay <jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 7:32 PM, Roger Guay wrote:
>> Once more, I point out that this might be a good new revenue stream
>> for LC!!! Does it hurt anyone?
> Well, it could hurt the company if everyone suddenly decides they're a hobbyist. But let's take the thought experiment a little farther. What restrictions would you (anyone) put on a "hobbyist" license to differentiate it from the regular Indy license? It would have to prevent people from gaming the system.
> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode