This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things

[Richmond]

On 09/10/2015 04:28 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 12:06 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry you felt it was passive-aggressively not accepted. It was 
>> meant
>> neither as passive-agressively <anything>, nor <anything> not accepted.
>
> Well, that was intended to be a flippant remark, the the posting 
> subject should have reinforced that.
> Seems like I struck a nerve.
> I was referring to the fact that my pull request wasn't rejected, but 
> it also was placed in a we're-not-going-to-accept-this category.
> See my further comments to Mark's post, but otherwise my apology for 
> the unintended slight.
>

Mark, "*flippant*" remarks often seem to hit nerves over at the 
mother-ship, lest you haven't noticed.

We could open a whole new thread about *intentionality* here . . .

Richmond.