Totally Loopy

[Richmond]

On 18/07/15 09:48, David Bovill wrote:
> Now that make no sense :)

It does seem odd that that would be better than SET THE VIS or HIDE / SHOW.

Richmond.

>
> On 17 July 2015 at 19:17, Roger Eller <roger.e.eller at sealedair.com> wrote:
>
>> I have also found that toggling the blendLevel from 100 to 0 is very quick
>> and efficient, compared to hide/show.
>>
>> ~Roger
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Scott Rossi <scott at tactilemedia.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In addition to the wait(/send?) options proposed, you might consider
>>> displaying your animation more efficiently. Showing an image and hiding
>>> another requires two steps and is inefficient.  You can use a transparent
>>> button to display your "frames" by setting the icon property of the
>> button
>>> to the ID of each of your images in succession, without having to hide
>> any
>>> image. Plus it's much easier to move the animation around the card since
>>> you only need to move the button and don't need to concern yourself with
>>> the locations of the images.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Scott Rossi
>>> Creative Director
>>> Tactile Media UX/UI Design
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode