Why can't LC do what PencilCase does?
gcanyon at gmail.com
Wed Apr 15 17:58:05 CEST 2015
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com>
> On 14/04/15 18:17, Geoff Canyon wrote:
>> PencilCase <http://www.pencilcase.io> has a player app on iOS
>> <http://appstore.com/pencilcaseplayer> so you can:
>> 1. Design your app on a Mac
>> 2. Upload it to their system and get a code
>> 3. Give that code to anyone
>> 4. Anyone can install the PencilCase iOS app
>> 5. Anyone can put in your code to run your app immediately.
>> If they can do it, shouldn't LC be able to as well? Or is there something
>> I'm not thinking of?
> A few questions:
> 1. "upload it to their system": well, who are 'they'?
The PencilCase team.
> 2. "Anyone can install the PencilCase iOS app": really? I'll try on my G3
> iMac running Mac OS 9.
It's an iOS app, as I stated, so I'm not sure what your objection is.
> 2.1. "Anyone can install the PencilCase iOS app": really? I'll try on my
> iPad 1.
This is a more reasonable objection, but the installed base of iPad 1s is
what percent of the total market at this point?
> Your "anyone" is about as good as Marie Antoinette's "Let them eat cake".
This seems like pointless criticism. Did I offend you somehow?
> WHY should LC be able to do "that:? The whole thing looks awfully
> and end-users (apart from being dependent on a iPad) need to install
Because it makes testing your iOS app almost trivial. In comparison to the
many hoops to jump through that iOS imposes in general.
> Now LC can distribute STANDALONES to all sorts of platforms.
PencilCase can create standalones as well. I was just curious about whether
something had changed such that a LiveCode player app, which would make
testing stacks on iOS much much easier, was possible.
> To my mind LC looks like a better bet.
I'm not comparing the two, I'm just curious about this bit of functionality
because it seems like something that, technically, LC is well capable of.
More information about the use-livecode