6.6.2 or 6.6.3???

Bob Sneidar bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Tue Sep 30 19:23:58 EDT 2014


No big deal, I just wanted to make sure that the posted update was not actually 6.6.2. 

Bob S


On Sep 26, 2014, at 11:38 , Fraser Gordon <fraser.gordon at livecode.com> wrote:

> On 26/09/2014 19:24, larry at significantplanet.org wrote:
>> Hi Bob,
>> I had the exact same experience that you did.
>> I just assumed it was a display bug with LC and ignored it. When I got
>> the alert about 6.6.3, I just chose "Skip this version."
>> Maybe you or someone will report it as a bug.
>> Larry
> That's exactly what it is - a minor bug caused by an oversight on my
> part (I forgot to update the version information file on the Windows
> build machine). Given the relative urgency of getting 6.6.3 out, it
> didn't seem worthwhile delaying the release (it would have been all
> platforms because the standalone engine version is wrong too).
> 
> If you submit a bug report, it would immediately get set to
> AWAITING_BUILD; after all, it will be fixed in the next build ;)
> 
> Regards,
> Fraser
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode





More information about the use-livecode mailing list