RevOnline & User Comments in the Dictionary

[Richmond]

On 27/07/14 17:27, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Peter M. Brigham wrote:
>
> > (Sorry, like Richmond, I am not using LC 6.x for most of what I
> > do, since that would involve updating 32,000 lines of script.)
>
> I must have missed something, as I've been happily working away in v6 
> without ever noticing that my old code wasn't supposed to work.
>
> Can you offer any specifics about what your 32,000 lines are using 
> that requires them to be rewritten for v6?
>

I wonder if that is the thing about numToChar: if so, that is exactly 
the same up to but excluding
the version 7 series.

I am unaware of anything else not being backwards compatible.

Richmond.