Standard Library

[John Craig]

Agree - matchText and matchChunk would both benefit from the ability to 
specify an array to fill with matches - we don't always know exactly how 
many will appear ..

http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11391


On 12/08/2014 02:12, Peter Haworth wrote:
> I've always kinda thought the return variable parm to matchText was a 
> little strange as it relies on you knowing how many matches will be 
> found in advance. It would be great if the returned variable could be 
> an array keyed by the numeric match number, alike the variables you 
> can supply to the some of the database functions.