Sorry

[Richmond]

Dear Hermann, et al, sic transit gloria mundi,

The Use-List is full of prickly types [whether geniuses, would-be 
geniuses, people with complexes because they know they are not geniuses, 
morons plain-and-simple, and normal folk who got out of bed the wrong 
side that day]: but the whole world is like that, so roll with the 
punches, be forgiving, and with any luck you won't get chased round the 
town by an axe-wielding Livecode programmer . . . LOL

Life's too short baby!

Almost all of the people who write on the Use-List, "personality 
defects" or not, have got
something good to bring to the table: and that is what we should focus on.

Richmond.

On 9.08.2014 02:09, hh wrote:
> 'phaworth' posted in the forum:
>> @-hh
>> Since you asked for judgement on your level of impertinence, I find
>> it to be extreme, rude, condesending and insulting. Not only in this
>> post but in others both here and in your mailing list posts.
>>   
> No cite, no quote. As we never had contact in the forum I thought about which post in the mailing list he could mean. Possibly sentence 2 of paragraph 1 of this answer to jacque?
>
>> Certainly there are some geniuses here, probably I know most (I read
>> this year's archives last week). But there are also some who believe
>> they are genius and being immune to feedback would others also make
>> believe this.
>> I'm well exercised in bluff detection, one hasn't to be genius for
>> that. And you never bluff, that's why you have this good reputation.
> I hereby assert, that I didn't mean him by second sentence of the first paragraph (also not by first sentence).
>
> And I ask everybody who feels to be meant by second sentence of this first paragraph to accept my apologies, sorry. And to be happy: This is my last post here.
>
> Hermann
>