500 ms to set a thumbpos??
dochawk at gmail.com
Mon Apr 14 08:34:03 CEST 2014
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, J. Landman Gay
<jacque at hyperactivesw.com>wrote:
> I see, so he's only calling ck once at the end. I had thought it was part
> of a longer sequence where it was interspersed throughout.
Just the once, and it just appends after a scrolling field in another
window and puts to the message box (it's really so that I can log/debug in
In that case you're quite right and the logging handler doesn't matter.
> But that leaves the question of what those 38s are doing in there with 0
> milliseconds between them.
I put a log after every statement in the handler to see where the time was
This is with 6.6. I found that with a new stack, the time dropped
I then found another time-hole. Setting the disabled of a combobox takes
about 400ms, and this occurred in a brand new stack, too.
I then loaded the stacks with 5.5, and the thumbpos still took something
like 23 ms, but the disabled dropped to a couple of ms.
I knew the 6 serious was low-beta grade all along, but this is kind of
ridiculous . . .
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
More information about the use-livecode