Printing quality in 6.5

[Marty Knapp]

Hey Bob,
The problem only seems to happen in the 6.5 IDE. In the 6.1.3 IDE it's 
fine. If I use the font in TextEdit it works fine. And it worked in a 
standalone made with 6.5. Go figure!

Marty
> Sounds like Mavericks is using the bitmap and not the vector. Any chance you have some kind of font ID conflict?
>
> Bob Sneidar
> IT Technician
> Integrated Office Technology
> bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com<mailto:bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com>
> 714-401-2407
>
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 15:00 , william humphrey <bill at bluewatermaritime.com<mailto:bill at bluewatermaritime.com>> wrote:
>
> It  happens to me only when I import images.
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Marty Knapp <martyknappster at gmail.com<mailto:martyknappster at gmail.com>> wrote:
> For what it's worth, this appears to be related to just this one aftermarket
> font. I did try building a standalone in 6.5 and printed from that and it
> seems to be fine, so it's this one font in the 6.5 IDE (and any PDFs I
> create from there). Works fine everywhere else. How weird is that? We'll see
> how it goes.
>
> Marty
>
> I just printed to PDF and enlarged it, looked good, printed the PDF not so
> good. This was done on Mavericks. So I then transferred the PDF to a Snow
> Leopard machine and it prints fine, so it appears to be a Mavericks issue.
> The weird thing is that printing from LC 6.1.3 on Mavericks looks good.
>
> Marty
>
> Hi Marty,
>
> Just done a test and found no problems printing text or high res images
> on Mac OS X 10.8.5 to Epson R2000, I can't see any difference at all.
>
> I also printed to PDF and compared enlarged PDFs, still no difference, in
> fact at max enlargement in Preview the text is still crisp indicating that
> LC printed the text as vector data not pixel data.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 2013-11-27, at 1:11 PM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com<mailto:richmondmathewson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 27.11.2013 22:33, Marty Knapp wrote:
>
> I just did a quick test print on my Mac of a stack with a couple of
> fields with text in them. In LC 6.1.3 the text is nice and crisp but on 6.5
> it's a bit pixelated - definitely lower quality. It looks like it's printing
> it as a graphic. Haven't tried it on Windows but this is not good news for
> me. Is anybody else seeing this?
>
> Marty Knapp
>
> I don't quite understand how that can have happened.
>
> I thought that 6.1.3 was merged with 6.5.0; maybe not.
>
> Richmond.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com<mailto:use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.bluewatermaritime.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


-- 
Best regards,
Marty Knapp
Knappster Solutions LLC
---------------------------
<www.CheckBuilderPro.com>