Why does this line work in IDE, fail in standalone?

Peter Haworth pete at lcsql.com
Sun Nov 24 19:58:37 CET 2013


Another belated thought on this since I've just run into the same issue.

I'm not seeing why copying a control from a password protected stack poses
a security issue if it does not have a script.  I can quite easily see the
graphic representation of the object and see or change any of it's
properties, including custom ones, via script or the IDE.

Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Richard Gaskin
<ambassador at fourthworld.com>wrote:

> Cloning objects that contain scripts seems like a good candidate for
> behaviors, where you could protect the stack that has the behavior script
> and leave the stack that has the template object to be cloned without a
> password, since it won't have any code anyway.
>
> --
>  Richard Gaskin
>  Fourth World
>  LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
>  Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
>  Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


More information about the use-livecode mailing list