Need advice on MacOS standalones and externals
Marian Petrides, MD
mpetrides at earthlink.net
Sun Nov 10 00:30:23 EST 2013
Universal creates an app that will run on both PowerPC Macs and on Intel Macs. As a consequence, such an app is larger than an Intel-only app. That's the only downside I can see to selecting Universal. OTOH, If PowerPC is truly irrelevant to your users (as you stated in your query), why bloat your app?
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:40 PM, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Most of my LC work has been Windows-centered, but I need to get some
> things running on the Mac, and they involve an external. I've installed LC
> and Xcode 5 on a laptop running MacOS 10.8, but I can't get LC to see my
> When I make a standalone, LC lets me enable any combination of
> "Universal", "PowerPC Only", or "Intel Only". PowerPC is irrelevant, but
> which do I choose, Universal or Intel?
> Also, when building my external, Xcode lets me choose between 32-bit and
> 64-bit. Does that have to match the IDE's bit width to use under the IDE?
> Does it have to match the standalone to use with the standalone? Which do
> I choose?
> Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul mailto:pderocco at ix.netcom.com
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode