Misunderstanding developer previews versus release candidates

[Roger Eller]

Oh Richmond!  I meant to say "software titles".  ;-p
On Nov 3, 2013 1:36 PM, "Richmond" <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3.11.2013 20:23, Roger Eller wrote:
>
>> On Nov 3, 2013 1:01 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
>>
>>> If they've proved stable in-house, they are apt to go directly to release
>>>
>> candidate for final testing.
>> Speaking of apt, I wonder if the Linux version of LC Community will ever
>> become accessible via apt-get, as are most Linux software.
>>
>>
> Surely that should read:
>
> "as IS most Linux software"
>
> 'software' being (last time I looked) both an uncountable and a mass noun.
>
> Richmond.
>
>  --
>>> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>>> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>>>
>> ~Roger
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>