Misunderstanding developer previews versus release candidates
roger.e.eller at sealedair.com
Sun Nov 3 19:41:11 CET 2013
Oh Richmond! I meant to say "software titles". ;-p
On Nov 3, 2013 1:36 PM, "Richmond" <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3.11.2013 20:23, Roger Eller wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2013 1:01 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
>>> If they've proved stable in-house, they are apt to go directly to release
>> candidate for final testing.
>> Speaking of apt, I wonder if the Linux version of LC Community will ever
>> become accessible via apt-get, as are most Linux software.
> Surely that should read:
> "as IS most Linux software"
> 'software' being (last time I looked) both an uncountable and a mass noun.
>>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>>> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode