Misunderstanding developer previews versus release candidates

Richmond richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Sun Nov 3 13:36:15 EST 2013

On 3.11.2013 20:23, Roger Eller wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2013 1:01 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
>> If they've proved stable in-house, they are apt to go directly to release
> candidate for final testing.
> Speaking of apt, I wonder if the Linux version of LC Community will ever
> become accessible via apt-get, as are most Linux software.

Surely that should read:

"as IS most Linux software"

'software' being (last time I looked) both an uncountable and a mass noun.


>> --
>> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> ~Roger
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list