Chained Behaviors

[Peter Haworth]

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com
> wrote:

> t obviates the switch statement.
>
> We could take this question one step back and ask why we'd want behaviors
> at all, when we could just use frontScripts with switch statements instead.
>
> But that thought experiment (hopefully) makes the case for behaviors clear.
>
> Nested behaviors simply extend the value of such a mechanism, at long last
> giving xTalk one of the most valuable aspects of OOP:  subclasses.
>

I'm definitely not against behaviors themselves, just trying to understand
the value of chaining them.

Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>