Chained Behaviors

[John Dixon]

Jaques...

I understand 'behaviors', I use them quite a lot of the time... I just don't see the need to continue with the 'chain' in xTalk... I think that this is the thin end of the wedge... changing things using the argument, 'well, that's what happens in other languages... so what ?!

Dixie

> Subject: Re: Chained Behaviors
> From: jacques.clavel at gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:07:55 +0200
> To: use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> 
> John,
> 
> in my opinion, behaviors is simplicity. You don't have to deal with the name of the buttons (for example), just use "me". It is completely on the road of a xTalk language. Same things for nested behaviors.
> 
> Jacques Clavell