"this me"?

[J. Landman Gay]

On 8/9/13 1:41 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:22 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> On 8/9/13 1:06 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Devin Asay <devin_asay at byu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:25 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/8/13 6:13 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying that implementing "this me" wasn't one of those times?
>>>>>> It was a very clever ploy to force us all to have this discussion I
>>>>>> think ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> You want to know what's really weird? The more we talk about this, the
>>>> more sense "this me" makes. Wait. I never said that.
>>>>
>>>> Well, this me thinks this me is weird. But that's just me. This one, not
>>>> another one.
>>>>
>>>> Devin
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, if you (Devin) had Jacque set as your behavior, then for you, "me"
>>> would think "this me" is weird syntax, but "this me" would think "this me"
>>> makes sense. Actually, that doesn't follow the rules of the language. I
>>> worked hard on it, so I'll send it anyway.
>>
>> I want to be his behavior. Then I can sit here inert, while Devin does all my work for this me.
>
> No, the behavior does all the work.
>
> set the this me of me to the this me of Jacque

Oh right. This me got confused. We can't have this me doing all the work.

I was telling The Husband about the naming debate and he suggested that 
since we're talking about parent scripts, we replace "this me" with 
"mama me".

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com