Comment Lines interfere with continuation lines
Bob Sneidar
bobs at twft.com
Thu Jun 28 11:43:37 EDT 2012
That is odd because it wouldn't compile for me. Not sure why we are seeing different things. There cannot be a command or function that uses a reserved word so "with" cannot be a command or function.
Bob
On Jun 27, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> Hi Peter, and Bob,
> I see what you're saying but if that's the case I would have expected to
> get a compile error. "with p1, p2" is certainly not a valid instruction.
>
> Although I just checked that out by inserting exactly that line in a the
> middle of a script - no compile error. I think it is interpreting it as a
> call to a handler named "with". However, when the script ran, it failed
> with a runtime error on that line. Even tried it with a comment line
> immediately before it and same runtime error.
>
> I suppose there's only so much you can expect the compile phase to do but I
> still think that should have resulted in a runtime error rather than just
> ignoring that line
>
> My least favorite LC compile problem is that it seems to be incapable of
> distinguishing:
>
> repeat for each line tLine in ...
>
> from
>
> repeat with x=1 to …..
>
> If I mix the two:
>
> repeat for x=1 to …..
>
> … the compile doesn't catch it but I get a runtime error.
>
> Pete
> lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Peter M. Brigham <pmbrig at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that's because according to Bob's analysis, the parser sees "with
>> p1, p2" as a misconstructed line of script, not as a comment.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list