Linux application crashes

Glen Bojsza gbojsza at gmail.com
Fri Apr 13 11:22:02 EDT 2012


The tarball can be gotten here...

http://www.box.com/s/07d396287def00f59b8e

If you launch the application then all you need to do is click any of the
images in the scrolling field and watch the memory.

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Glen Bojsza <gbojsza at gmail.com> wrote:

> I build a scaled version of a test stack and application and sent it to
> support.
>
> On my system this shows an increase of 1.2% to 1.4% in memory usage with
> each click... so from a stress test perspective 70 clicks or less and the
> application crashes. the memory continues to climb unless the application
> is closed. There is also a button that removes all the images (ie start
> clean) and the memory does not decrease or change.
>
> So we will wait to hear from the support team.
>
> I have tarred the folder and if anyone wants to try it (24.6 MB) then let
> me know since I need to use an email address when sharing from google docs.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Bernard Devlin <bdrunrev at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This sounds similar.
>> http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7257
>>
>> Not saying it is the same bug.  Just your description triggered a
>> familiar odour.
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Glen Bojsza <gbojsza at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > My latest update / feedback on the issue...
>> >
>> > I tried monitoring the memory on the Centos 6.2 system with top -p
>> $(pgrep
>> > Xorg) and watching the %MEM. It was really interesting and
>> informative...
>> > when I launched the application I was down at 1.5% MEM and as I did
>> > database queries and plots I saw it increase between 0.3 and 0.5 % each
>> > time (This had several queries with large numbers of data).
>> >
>> > To address Tim's concern I stopped doing any graphing and solely did a
>> > series of import snapshots.
>> >
>>
>> snip
>>
>> > So essentially, going through this cycle several times showed the
>> memory to
>> > start increasing approximately .7% each cycle. (this is where there are
>> 20
>> > cards so 20 images)
>> >
>> > I increased the number of cards / images to 40 and the memory started to
>> > increase 1.2% each cycle!
>> >
>> > Never has the memory decreased.
>> >
>> > I removed ALL images and cards except for the intro card and the memory
>> > never decreased?!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
>
>



More information about the use-livecode mailing list