Object naming conventions
pete at mollysrevenge.com
Fri Oct 7 16:22:38 EDT 2011
Thanks Ken, looks like a very interesting document.
Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ken Ray <kray at sonsothunder.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Pete wrote:
> > Thanks for the thoughts Bob.
> > For those who have replied, here's the reason behind the question.
> > I'm about to ask for beta testers for an LC tool that greatly speeds up
> > development of applications that use SQL databases. Part of the tool is
> > palette of controls that you can drag and drop onto your cards, answer a
> > couple of easy questions and the control will be linked to your database.
> > Right now, I use a naming convention for controls so that the tool's
> > runtime library can recognize controls that are significant to it.
> > My concern is that I'm imposing my naming convention on anyone who wants
> > make use of the tool. Whether you'd be willing to give up your naming
> > conventions in exchange for the productivity gains you'll get from using
> > tool - that's the question.
> If it helps, there was some work on this by the RunRev Interoperability
> Project at the 'revInterop' Yahoo group:
> I know Richard put a mirror of the document we were working on somewhere,
> but I can't recall where, so I put it here for download/direct display:
> It hasn't been updated in a while, but I know several developers (including
> myself, of course) that are using (most) of the specification in their own
> Ken Ray
> Sons of Thunder Software, Inc.
> Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
> Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode