Reading PDF documents
chipp at altuit.com
Sun Oct 2 13:22:07 CDT 2011
Good sleuthing Bernard! Most valuable. I suspect if this can be tested, it would be super easy to "suck up" this exe into an app and then "spit it out" on first run.
(see Chipp's Tips below)
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc
On Oct 2, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Bernard Devlin <bdrunrev at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just downloaded one of the binaries from the IM download site (the
> zip file that is meant to require no installation/windows registry
> atlerations). No compilation was involved. No error messages were
> thrown up in the installation (i.e. unzipping process). I found what
> I took to be the GUI interface to IM, and fired it up. No errors.
> The zip file was indeed 43mb, which expanded out to 109mb. I looked
> at the files included in the zip archive, and saw one called
> "convert.exe". I could not imagine that Mark intends for customers to
> go through a full "end user GUI" install. So, as a test, I copied
> convert.exe into a temp directory and ran it from a command prompt.
> It complained about needing a dll, so I copied that over. Then it ran
> without complaining, and explained what the command line options were.
> That is the kind of environment in which one would use shell to get
> an external program to do some work.
> The combined size of exe + dll combination was about 7mb. Considering
> that the Skype client weighs in at 23mb, Chrome is 44mb, and iWorks is
> a 474mb download, I think we really need to move beyond a fixation on
> the size of an application being downloaded. I don't use Skype more
> than once a month. I downloaded half a gigabyte from Apple just have
> a look at Keynote. Clearly having a large initial download does not
> stop most businesses from thriving (or Apple would have ditched iWorks
> long ago). I imagine Graham's clients would be happy to download an
> application that was 20mb bigger if it could do what they want it to
> do. A LiveCode + IM exe/dll + Ghostscript exe/dll might still be
> smaller than the Skype client. My home DSL line has a (soft) limit of
> 20gb a month - many of the customers exceed that considerably and on a
> regular basis. We are not in the days of dialup modems. Almost the
> whole of the web is predicated on people being prepared to download
> massive files (a friend of mine was recently reduced to using a dialup
> modem for a week, and she couldn't even moderate the comments on her
> blog that way).
> My experiment was on a "Vista Home" laptop. It didn't strike me as a
> particularly difficult nor onerous task to do this test. And I have
> no interest in nor experience with ImageMagick.
> I surmised this is the kind of scenario that Mark was working with.
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Chipp Walters <chipp at chipp.com> wrote:
>> FYI, the ImageMagick DL is over 43 Mb, and the GhostScript install is
>> another 12 each for 64-bit and 32-bit. Plus there's the necessity of
>> detecting which Windows OS you're on vs which to install. Creating an
>> installer which can correctly install all of this is not trivial, and it
>> will create a final installation substantially larger in filesize than the
>> LC application-- and difficult for many to download. And then there's this
>> bit of information regarding AFTER installing the compiled binary:
>> "If you have any problems, install the Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable
>> Package (x86) or Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable Package (x64). 64-bit
>> Windows requires both packages (x86 & x64)."
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode