[ANN] "World's first supercomputer tablet"

Alex Tweedly alex at tweedly.net
Wed Nov 9 12:35:01 EST 2011


On 09/11/2011 17:08, Andre Garzia wrote:
> Scripting resizeStack is a good exercise but we really should aim to some
> form of resolution independence here. Mobile apps tend to use more images
> as decoration than desktop apps, with all those different resolutions, you
> need to carry a lot of images of different sizes in your app or loose time
> resizing them at runtime. Asus Eee Prime Pad is just one among the
> different Android Tablets our there, each running a different resolution
> and screwing my resizes.

So long as we don't have proper resolution independence, should we 
instead try for re-sizing at installation time (or, failing that, 
perhaps "resize on first use").

I know almost nothing about mobile - but I suspect that in most cases 
the resolution is 'fixed' for any particular installation of an app, so 
resizing either as the last step of installation or when the image is 
first displayed would avoid repeated time lost to resizing. You might 
need a "meta-resize" to determine for any particular screen resolution 
what size each of your images needs to be. Then, if mobile installation 
allows it, you could do a one-time resize of the images; if not then it 
might need to happen on first use. Would users prefer to see a message 
("New installation being completed") on first starting up an app (maybe 
combined with registration or other first-time actions)? Or would it be 
better to simply hide that cost during usage ?

-- Alex.




More information about the use-livecode mailing list