OT: are 72dpi still state of the art for screen design?

Bob Sneidar bobs at twft.com
Tue May 3 12:10:53 EDT 2011


Hah hah! Try explaining all this to a graphic artist who never used a computer before! Years ago we had an excellent illustrator come to work for us to revamp all our corporate art and what have you. He had learned to do everything "conventionally" which is code for "old school" because at the time that is all they had. 

But they were just starting to use digital film processing, so I figured I'd let him in on that thinking he's be excited. He insisted that it was not presently (then) possible, and that the technology was 10 years away. His college instructor had said so, and what, did I know better than him??

So I produced a book cover for our next publication, and when I showed it to him I announced it had been done entirely digitally. That woke him up. 

All this talk about PPI and DPI brings back memories. <sigh>

Bob


On May 2, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Terry Vogelaar wrote:

> Hi Tiemo,
> 
> I like to supplement to what Colin is saying, that as long as we talk about screens, there is practically no way to tell how large a pixel is. So you can fill in whatever measure suits you. On screens, the only 'true' measurement is pixels.
> 
> Currently I have an external screen attached to my iMac. The built-in one is 110 ppi (pixels per inch; dpi is only correct for printers), and the other screen is 86 ppi. Should it recalculate all measurements to compensate that difference? I don't think so, and neither do the makers of the system software. So when I drag a window from one monitor to another, I see it enlarge. 
> 
> The OS actually cannot know how large a pixel is on the monitor it is displaying on. Take LCD projectors for example. I use an 1024 x 768 pixel setting to project on a screen, but there is no way for the software to know how large a pixel on the screen is. It might be in a range between 5 and 25 ppi. 
> 
> So, you can follow the old Macintosh convention of 72 ppi, or Windows with its 96 ppi standard. Both are equally incorrect and irrelevant. Use whatever value that suits you. The number of pixels per inch only starts to matter when you print the image. Only then the dimensions of the image become measurable with a ruler.
> 
> 
> Terry
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode





More information about the use-livecode mailing list