The Wait command

[J. Landman Gay]

On 6/24/11 3:52 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> See this is the perfect example of why some kind of multiple
> processing thing is needed. If you say
>
> wait until<condition>  then no other processing can take place.

The OP specifically wanted to block all other processes, so in this case 
"wait" is a good solution.

For the cases where you want to simulate multi-threading, either wait 
with messages, or set up a "send in <time>" sequence. Sending is usually 
the better way to do it.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com