[audio] Call for an updated enhanced quicktime audio library or a small audio complementary library!

René Micout rene.micout at numericable.com
Sun May 16 08:33:32 EDT 2010


Robert
I am very interested in your requests, myself repeatedly mentioned the lack of Runrev about Audio.
Thatt interests me most is related functions "Midi", ie to create sounds directly from RunRev for them to be "played" by the QuickTime synthesizer (or other ...).
Unfortunately I have not the skills required to create these functions.
I just did a search in Gmane (Midi / audio), the results are "1893" results for "Audio" and "527" for "south" I think many RevTalker are interested in the subject.
René

Robert,
Je suis très intéressé par vos demandes, ayant, moi-même à de nombreuses reprises évoqué les manques de Runrev en matière d'Audio.
Pour ce qui me concerne, ce qui m'intéresse le plus ce sont des fonctions liées au "Midi", c'est à dire pouvoir créer des sons directement depuis RunRev pour qu'ils soient "joués" par le synthétiseur QuickTime (ou autre...).
Je n'ai malheureusement pas non plus les compétences requises pour créer ces fonctions.
Je viens de faire une recherche dans GMane (Midi/audio), les résultats sont 1893 résultats pour "Audio" et "527" pour "Midi", je pense que beaucoup de RevTalker sont intéressés par le sujet.
René

Le 14 mai 2010 à 13:49, Robert Mann a écrit :

> 
> We have a  runrev "hole" that would call for an external library regarding
> basic audio functions :
> -- runrev uses quicktimes, and just allow to play and record, full stop.
> -- a quicktime external "enhanced" library does add a quite a lot of
> functions. But it is mostly targeted at video. Example : the transition
> filter does not seem to deal with the audio channels.. so no audio fade in
> or fade out. Up to now it is the great and only existing sound library for
> runrev, thanks to Trevor Devore.
> 
> It took me quite a while to come up with a solution to record sounds and
> concatenate them and then output a mp3 file. The only decent solution I
> found was to record wave, transcode in mp3 using lame and then re-transform
> into .mov with trevor devore eQt lib, to finally import a compact internal
> audio file in the form of a movie, since internally runrev does not read
> mp3, and finally destroy the intermediate files... pfffff!!! The next person
> that talls me that runrev reduces programming by an order of x10... i'll ask
> to demonstrate with what should be a simple task like that!! for me it was
> more like complication of x100 magnitude because I nearly found the no
> solution wall, and frankly, this is not satisfactory to deploy. And there is
> more now :
> 
> Sound quality is something important to users, even unconsciously it brings
> a sense of quality. Se we miss just a few basic sound functions like : 
> 
> A) to enhance quality of recorded wave files :
> 1- fade in / fade out
> 2- cross mix fade in and out between two or more files.
> 3- normalization
> 4- a simple basic reverb/echo combined for voice/music with basic setting
> 
> ==> Just 1) and 2/ would already be great to deal with recorded material
> within runrev !
> 
> B) to output mp3 (so far we have to use lame which is great, but, implies
> installing that on each computer... an included plugin would be much more
> simple and reduce risks of support issues)
> 
> C) ?? if hunger for .. basic mix functions between deifferent sound files,
> opening up a new era for runrev for music tools... 
> 
> D) some in depth tools like a library to open up a wave file extract content
> and make it possible to add expand audio libraries in xTalk. There was an
> revOline stack that showed how to do that already, but outlined one need
> basic quicker library functions to make it operationnal.
> 
> I personnaly do not have the competence to do that, otherwise I sure would!
> 
> Some of you and some french folks in particular, have made some great audio
> work already using runrev. I do believe that runrev could attract more of
> that music and sound NRJ. And I personnaly would of course pay for such
> libraries, if that cost can be shared (smile.. to sell it back tu runrev
> afeter??!!)
> 
> Any thought welcomed... 
> 
> -- possibly to confirm the need for that (Am I all alone there??! smile!)
> 
> -- help target (what do we really need as a whole) ??
> 
> -- help set up something to make it happen (hunger strike at runrev or
> pre-ordering to an interesting party?)
> 
> So long from France!
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/audio-Call-for-an-updated-enhanced-quicktime-audio-library-or-a-small-audio-complementary-library-tp2216458p2216458.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




More information about the use-livecode mailing list