RevStore
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Sat May 1 22:13:35 EDT 2010
Richard Gaskin wrote:
> When people look at a tool like Rev they
> want to see there's a sizable afternarket as an indicator of viability.
> So it benefits RunRev more than anyone else to improve the
> presentation of third-party offerings all over their site.
But with caution. I'm in favor of keeping it out of the spotlight until
there are many more apps available, hundreds hopefully. A few meager
offerings is not inspiring.
And they have to be quality offerings. As someone who had to review and
release hundreds of HC stacks to the AOL libraries, I know that 99% of
what came in was pure crap. Because HC was so accessible, everyone
thought they were a developer. Avoidance of even the suggestion of a HIG
was the norm. Radio buttons used as checkboxes or pushbuttons ("because
I like how they look,") menus missing or out of order ("I don't need an
Edit menu,") known commercial app icons (MacWrite) used for private
stack purposes ("go cd images",) you name it. Virtually everything about
these stacks was wrong. Outsiders scoffed. Rightfully.
And then there were the kids. I wavered between disgust and delight.
Their stacks were invariably flip card animations done with crude line
drawings, generally on topics humorous to nine year olds. "Kill Barney"
was very popular, we had probably a dozen of those, not counting the
rejected ones. The weapon of choice varied from guns (all models) to
swords and knives; one stick man farted old Barney to death. We had to
make a separate library for these and tag them with editorial code words
like "simple line drawings" so that everyone else would know not to
download them.
This lack of professionalism in HC stacks was one of the reasons it was
rarely regarded as a serious tool, and it gave HC a bad name generally.
The number of really good stacks was pretty small. Unfair as it is, the
quality of the output often reflects on the tools used rather than the
authors. If there is ever a Rev app store, it needs to have lots of
files, all of which pass a certain standard of professionalism. That
means someone has to check and verify every submission, which would open
a whole other can of worms.
I confess though, in retrospect I really do wish I'd saved a copy of
"Man Gets Beheaded By a Ceiling Fan." You had to be there.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list