OT: Parallels or VMWare Fusion?

[Pierre Sahores]

True and never more than 3-4% while PC's apps are on idle ;-)

Kind Regards,

P.

Le 19 févr. 10 à 15:00, Andre Garzia a écrit :

> Pierre,
>
> Smaller processor's time needs means it doesn't lock the computer all
> time like parallels used to?
>
> :D
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Sahores <psahores at free.fr>  
> wrote:
>> Same here after a direct switch from Parallels 3.0 to Virtual Box,  
>> because
>> its smallest processor's time needs and because it never crashes ;-)
>>
>> Le 19 févr. 10 à 14:32, Andre Garzia a écrit :
>>
>>> I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order,
>>> now, I use only virtual box even as I've paid for Fusion 1.0 and
>>> Parallels from 1.0 to 3.0.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Pierre Sahores
>> mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70
>>
>> www.woooooooords.com
>> www.sahores-conseil.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
>> subscription
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70

www.woooooooords.com
www.sahores-conseil.com