[revServer] process timeout issue
andre at andregarzia.com
Fri Aug 6 12:58:11 EDT 2010
you guys bring me tears of joy for using technology right! :-D
Now, who will port ZeroMQ for us?
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Mark Talluto <userev at canelasoftware.com>wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> > I've been experimenting with spidering, data mining, and analytics, and
> like any processor-intensive tasks it would never occur to me to put them on
> a shared host.
> > Like many hosts, the one I'm using offers dedicated servers for less than
> $70/mo, but being a cheapskate I've gone one step further during this
> experimental phase: I bought a nettop off Ebay for just $150, set it up
> with Ubuntu and Rev, and that does all the heavy lifting 24/7, posting only
> the output from those process to my servers periodically as needed.
> > I never run into the CPU cycle limits most hosts have on their servers,
> and I don't even slow down my own web server from its tasks of serving pages
> to my visitors and handling their purchases.
> > When the workflow expands to required tighter integration between the
> processing and the output, I can move the system from my office to a
> dedicated server with multiple redundant fat-pipe connections for just a few
> bucks a month.
> > There are a million ways to create robust scalable infrastructures to
> handle any load. Many are cheap and easy to do, and for most of those tasks
> you can do them all in one fun language.
> We have been using this technique for years. We even posted the
> application we use to do this task in RevNet. I believe I need to update
> that file now that I think of it. But in short, we use our ISP to gather
> orders. Our client software sends a request for a key. Our local computer
> in the lab just pings the directory on the ISP every 4 seconds and downloads
> all the orders in that given directory. The heavy lifting and database work
> is done on a computer in the lab. The key is then sent back up to the ISP
> where the client computer is checking in for the result of that work every 4
> seconds. The whole thing works out nicely and we keep our CPU usage low.
> Best regards,
> Mark Talluto
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
More information about the Use-livecode