Stupid Send in Time Question

[Judy Perry]

Hello,

After not really using Rev for 3 years and finding myself with time on my 
hands, I decided to get reacquainted.

So, I'm taking little baby steps, trying to remember what little I knew 
three years ago.

I'm trying to do a timed presentation of images onscreen, so I end up with 
45 lines of script in which pretty much every other line is a wait 
statement (do something, wait, do something, wait).

Someone suggested I break the handler up into a bunch of little 
sub-handlers and use send in time and, remembering the oft-repeated list 
admonition to do this, I sat down to think about it.

But I don't get it.  This will result in a script that's orders of 
magnitude larger as each showing will need to have its own subhandler for 
the sending in time.

If I'm the only person running the stack in the IDE, is there any other 
benefit to be gained by adding all those additional lines other than not 
locking up the IDE when running the stack there?  Is there some 
better way to do it?

Kindest thanks,

Judy