Two questions about trev

[Jerry Daniels]

Ludovic,

I just tested tRev with Rev 2.8, 2.9, 3.0 and it worked fine. I had  
some unused 3.5-specific code I had to neglected to remove, but now  
that it's gone, the updated (just now) version of tRev tested well  
will those versions.

I did a tree view of the code that worked on handlers and other  
control structures. It just didn't hold up very well when scripts got  
sizable. Also, dealing with the many variations of if-then-else was  
not pleasant. I've still got code stubs in tRev to do folding,  
actually, but I tend to think it is a case of rubbing revolution's fur  
the wrong way. I've come to think it's not an ideal fit for the nature  
of the language or the text editing nature of the editing environs.

Best,

Jerry Daniels
Watch tRev - The Movie
http://reveditor.com/trev-the-movie

On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ludovic Thébault wrote:

> Hello,
>
> 1- What versions of Revolution are compatible with trev ? (i've 2.9.1)
> 2- It is possible to have a "tree" view in the code to reduce or  
> extend loop like "if…else…end if" or "switch…case…end switch" ? It  
> could be cool to verify the structure of the code when you have a  
> lot of imbricated loop.
>
> Thx_______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution