OT: Rev to Flash translation

[Neal Campbell K3NC]

Actionscript is more like C than anything else (well maybe  
Javascript). Tuning is  a real requirement so thats possibly why Colin  
was referring to a possible rewrite from the prototype.


Neal
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:01 AM, George C Brackett wrote:

> Thanks, Colin.  It's enough to know a rewrite would be required.   
> Why might a Flash prototype require a rewrite to produce a finished  
> product?  That sounds nuts!
>
> George
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:25 AM, George C Brackett wrote:
>
>> Is there enough commonality between the two systems to hope for a  
>> relatively easy translation?  Or would a total Flash re-write be  
>> the only reasonable option?
>
> They are as different as is possible, and it would be a rewrite. But  
> any kind of prototype to base the real one on is still useful. A  
> Flash prototype might still require a rewrite for the actual version.
>
> If you're curious about specific differences, give me an example few  
> lines of 'Talk script, and I'll show you what the ActionScript 3  
> version would look like.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution