Feeling a bit "NumToCharred"...

[Richmond Mathewson]

On 19/12/2009 01:10, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Richmond-
>
> Friday, December 18, 2009, 1:36:16 PM, you wrote:
>
>    
>> I wasn't aware it might be a bug until Mark Weider pointed it out;
>>      
> <g>  I suppose whether or not it's a bug is a matter of POV, but to me
> the docs seem to more than imply that non-double-byte chars will be
> converted as part of the "set the unicodetext" process. Reporting an
> error would also be ok. Ignoring the "standard" xTalk catenation
> syntax seems like a bug. I'm happy to do the honors if nobody else
> wants it.
>
>    

I would be most grateful if you could do that.