Initializing local properties
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Wed Apr 15 10:14:27 CDT 2009
David Bovill wrote:
> AFAIK - there is no easy or robust way to initialise local variables? That
> is you can't do something like:
> local thisWorks = "some long complicated result"
>> local thisDoesnt = getComplicatedResult()
>> function getComplicatedResult
>> return "some long complicated result"
>> end getComplicatedResult
There's a request for this in the RQCC:
> You could initialize things on a preopencard - but this would not allow for
> it's use when called from another stack - as in defining a custom property
> put the complicated_Result" of btn 1 of stack "Test"
> I think there is no way to do this with locals - so you have to functions or
> properties and calculate them each time for a handler? Using a global would
> be over-cluttering things.
Why are globals so unloved?
Most programming languages support them so they can be accessed
globally. If you need global access, why not use a global?
Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
More information about the use-livecode