lineoffset slower than "repeat for each line j" ?

[Ken Ray]

> Surprisingly, this takes only 106 ms !!!
> If anyone asked me beforehand, I would have sweared that a built-in Rev
> function would run faster than a bunch of transcript lines of code...

BTW, a very good set of script performance tips by Wil Djykstra are located
here:

Increasing Script Performance, Parts I-III:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/scrp005.htm
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/scrp006.htm
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/scrp007.htm

I've found them invaluable in squeezing performance out of Rev code.

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software, Inc.
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/