RunRev lack of rs232 Com Ports !

[camm29 at tesco.net]

Thanks for that , hoping a solution is out there with the users !!

Somehow I doubt Runrev will show any interest looking at the
many bugs/enhancements that have been outstanding for many
years.

Regards


---- Ian Wood <revlist at azurevision.co.uk> wrote: 
> I can't quite resist replying in the same way as last time...
> 
> I'm pretty sure enhancement requests don't get considered unless they  
> have more votes. Giving the URL to the enhancement request makes it  
> much easier for people to add their votes:
> http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=5169
> 
> Next, there are currently two votes. That means there are 265  
> enhancements with more votes.
> http://tinyurl.com/3b4ogd
> 
> Assigning your full five votes instead of the single vote you've  
> assigned would already bring that down to 128.
> http://tinyurl.com/2jyqpu
> 
> Ian
> 
> On 28 Feb 2008, at 11:48, <camm29 at tesco.net> wrote:
> 
> > Does anybody have a working solution to get more
> > rs232 com ports 1 - 9 in rev ??????????????
> >
> > This is a major drawback on developments , its has been raised as a  
> > bug
> > a long time ago.
> >
> > Regards
> > Camm
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-revolution mailing list
> > use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution