unicode - 2.6 vs 2.9

[Devin Asay]

On Aug 21, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Nicolas Cueto wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> Any reasons why a stack when converted
> into a standalone with 2.6 handles unicode
> text as expected, but not when built with 2.9?

Hi Nicolas,

I use Unicode text successfully all the time in 2.9. I know there were  
some improvements made to unicode implementation in 2.7. Can you give  
us some idea of what text isn't working right? I find it's generally  
more reliable to load unicode text into fields and buttons after  
launch, rather than entering it during development and then displaying  
it in a standalone. There are lots of issues to worry about, from OS  
to processor differences, for example.

Regards,

Devin

Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University