Standalone - Using stack as DB

[Peter Alcibiades]

Yes, very true.  This is, now its pointed out, obviously the underlying
source of my power off/saving problem.  Its also an argument against using
the traditional splash stack and then a real program + data stack, is it
not?  One should rather have a program main stack, and then data substacks. 
No need ever to save the program stack since it never changes, just save the
data stacks as changed.  Is this what you usually do?


Eric Chatonet wrote:
> 
> 
> I should have added that this way of doing never mix any line of code  
> with user's data in the same file.  And I think it important.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Standalone---Using-stack-as-DB-tp18756589p18787268.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.