peer to peer regression test proposal (was Re: QT controller on Vista: how to change volume?)

Eric Chatonet eric.chatonet at sosmartsoftware.com
Mon Oct 22 09:17:56 EDT 2007


Hi Andre and all,

Yes it's a good idea:
I don't do it systematically but I could test all my tutorials with  
every new version: each one focuses on a specific aspect of Rev (even  
if there are many others :-)

Le 21 oct. 07 à 21:28, Andre Garzia a écrit :

> I have here a little proposal for the volunteers on this list. With
> every release of an OS or Revolution we have some things breaking.
> This is the nature of things, we can't change it but we can help fix
> it.
>
> What about we build a community "regression test", some test stacks.
> Each volunteer or group of volunteer would build and mantain a little
> stack to test some subset of revolution. With each release and
> platform, they'd test it against the new thing and we could report
> back to runrev and web.
>
> I can host this and I can build the report thing and I volunteer to
> build the regression test for socket routines and libURL (which never
> breaks!)
>
> This way a small group can do some impact and help Bill at QC and
> RunRev team. Even if we can't test all of transcript and rev, if we
> test 40% if it, still we can guarantee that this 40% is working or
> broken which is nice anyway.
>
> A group of people could take care of QT controler and routines testing
> and quickly catch things such as this volume issue very fast.
>
> is this a good idea?



Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email: eric.chatonet at sosmartsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the use-livecode mailing list