AW: Quicktime and Encoder
Ian Wood
revlist at azurevision.co.uk
Tue Nov 20 05:26:46 EST 2007
On 20 Nov 2007, at 08:55, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
> having read a little bit more, H.264 seems to be a HD codec, if I
> am right.
> Do you know, or do you have a feeling, if I can - or if it makes
> sense, to
> use the H.264 codec to produce not HD material, captured with old PAL
> standard 720x576 to an output format 384x288 just to get best video
> quality?
h264 is *used* for a lot of HD content, but it's not limited to it.
YouTube are in the middle of re-encoding all their content using it.
> Or would Sorenson 3 VBR the choice in this case?
>
> The QT help site tells, that Sorenson 3 is supported. Is Sorenson 3
> VBR
> another (not supported) codec or just some encoding parameters of
> Sorenson 3
> which would also be supported by standard QT?
I don't think VBR Sor3 is supported as an encoding option without
buying the 'full' codec from Sorenson.
Ian
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list