Size of array
Petrides, M.D. Marian
mpetrides at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 17 20:56:40 EST 2007
Speaking of arrays... Am I correct in understanding that Rev only
supports one dimensional arrays or am I misreading the dox?
On Nov 17, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> Shari, I think this can be somewhat dependent on how much ram is
> available, but in my experience, rev handles fairly large arrays
> very well. I've had arrays consisting of 500 or so elements, each
> containing 2000+ items without any problem. So I'd stick with the
> one big array.
> On 17 Nov 2007, at 21:23, Shari wrote:
>> How big of an array have you created without noticing any reduction
>> in speed?
>> I'm pondering the best way to store a large conglomerate of data,
>> and was hoping for a general guideline as to how humungous of an
>> array I could create without tripping over it.
>> I'm currently set up to break it into smaller pieces. However, it
>> would be awesome if I could store the data all together.
>> The array would have about 300,000 pieces of data, broken into
>> about 300 keys, each with 1000 bits of data.
>> Currently I have 300 separate arrays planned, only one being loaded
>> at any given time.
>> Have any of you worked with arrays this size? Any speed issues?
>> WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
>> BIackjack GoId
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode