min() function anomalies
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Wed Jun 13 16:44:08 EDT 2007
> What bothers me more is that somewhere along the way, it was *
> changed *. This is a very fundamental change. I do not know if the
> change occurred before the MC/Rev merger or after. But either way, I
> wouldn't have expected it.
I agree that any change to a token's behavior should be documented. If
it changed during RunRev's tenure, it should be noted in their
Dictionary entry for the min token.
I do see one change there noted as introduced in v1.1, but that's for
something else. I don't see any mention of this change in their docs.
Shari, I'd suggest submitting this as a documentation request to BZ. It
may be minor, but it's still worth addressing to keep people well
informed, esp. those who've used earlier versions or are have HyperCard
Managing Editor, revJournal
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
More information about the Use-livecode