Open Source (was Don't you just wish Rev would do this?)

[Luis]

On 7 Jun 2007, at 4:59, Brian Yennie wrote:

Snip.

> I wouldn't mind seeing Rev follow a similar path. What if, for  
> example, you had the *paid* option to move from 2.9 to 2.9.1,  
> 2.9.2, 2.9.3, 2.9.4 and so on instead of jumping to 3.0? I'm  
> guessing many users here would pay for the option to stay with the  
> version they have if they knew it would be supported, bug fixed,  
> and kept compatible with OS updates. Yes it might cannibalize some  
> upgrades, but it would also create revenue from people who might  
> never upgrade to the next version, especially if they see the  
> current one breaking.
>

No thanks!

Cheers,

Luis.