Mac UB standalones and OS versions

[Sarah Reichelt]

On 6/3/07, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepetoo at cox.net> wrote:
> Now this is something I think we need to worry about less than having
> a "Classic" potential; since most people who have OSX are going to be
> moving up to the latest due to the ease with  which Apple makes
> updating the OS. Or am I in the minority when I get automatic updates
> from Apple on just about everything whenever there is new software?
> I'd be willing to bet that there are many, many fewer using OSX 2.8
> than are using OS9.2.

I notice that an increasing number of applications list their
requirements as 10.4.x
It used to be that 10.2.8 was the cutoff. As far as I am concerned, I
just want to know what I should list as the minimum system needed to
run my programs: does 10.3 still work OK?

Sarah