Developer Dreams... Random Numbers
Joe Lewis Wilkins
pepetoo at cox.net
Sun Dec 16 09:53:18 CST 2007
After reading a few of the site's FAQs, I can see that "they" have a
very high degree of confidence in the "randomness" they are
producing; however, as with all things in life, even "they" leave the
door open for the, what they consider to be remote possibility, that
even what they produce is not truly random. Proving one way or
another is just too much for anyone. Thanks for your own thoughts.
On Dec 16, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> The inability for computers to generate true random numbers is
> exactly why Random.org exists. The random numbers provided by that
> server are not generated by a computer but by mother nature. So,
> yes, Random.org is "really", _really_ and *really* random!
> Best regards,
> Mark Schonewille
> Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
> Quickly extract data from your HyperCard stacks with DIFfersifier.
> Op 16-dec-2007, om 6:40 heeft Joe Lewis Wilkins het volgende
>> Thanks, Bill.
>> Quite interesting; and, certainly, worth investigating in depth by
>> any who wish to use "random" numbers in their work. Probably still
>> not "really" random; but, using such huge sets from which to draw,
>> probably as close as we'll ever get.
>> Joe Wilkins
More information about the use-livecode