[Mostly OT] Tate Talks About Language-Adoption Risks
revolutionary.dan at gmail.com
Sat Sep 2 17:06:54 CDT 2006
I think it makes sense to try to find a niche for Rev in which it would
excel so well it would compel users of Java and those considering Ruby to
take a closer look at it. I don't think Internet apps are the place to do
that. As long as Rev is single-threaded, it doesn't hold much promise on the
server side of the Internet equation for scalable application deployment,
which is why I've started using Python/Plone as my Web app framework. Andre
Garzia and I worked hard (me on design and cheerleading, him on coding and
testing) to try to create Rev on Rockets as a Web framework but the single
threading is an absolute deal killer.
Database-driven and database-backed Web apps are the most popular kinds of
software being built today according to Bruce and lots of other folks.
Certainly those are the kinds of apps I want to build for the foreseeable
future. But as I survey the development of desktop apps, I don't see a
single niche category where Rev could take a dominant role and get
developers to sit up and take notice. I do, however, think that's necessary
for Rev to have a chance of much more widespread adoption among existing
On 9/2/06, jbv <jbv.silences at club-internet.fr> wrote:
> May be am I making a complete mistake, and may be there isn't any way
> to bridge the gap between Firefox as an open-source project and Rev as
> a commercial product... but somehow I keep feeling that integration of a
> Transcript kernel into a browser is an option to consider...
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author
Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
More information about the use-livecode