Rules governing stack purging
dcragg at lacscentre.co.uk
Mon Oct 30 16:15:13 EST 2006
On 30 Oct 2006, at 20:23, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> So while we have a workaround using this odd application of the
> "delete stack" command which doesn't actually delete the stack but
> merely purges it, I'm wondering if we should consider this behavior
> a bug, as least as far as stack with their destroyStack set to true
> are concerned?
I think the current behavior can be seen as useful, although I agree
it might seem odd in some ways.
Say I want to do this:
set the cProp of stack "C:/myStack.rev"
save stack "C:/myStack.rev"
If the stack is automatically purged after setting the prop, will the
change be saved? By current logic, presumably not. And what will get
saved in the second statement?
> Also, would it be worth pursuing a request for a "purge stack"
> command so newcomers don't get the impression that "delete stack"
> will actually delete their stack?
You've only been asking for that for 8 years, Richard. Have patience!
But yes, I think it would be good. However, I imagine it's not just a
case of creating a synonym for "delete", as the behavior when applied
to substacks would be different.
More information about the Use-livecode