Matchtext script results
rjb at robelko.com
Thu Nov 30 18:45:27 CST 2006
>And that is what surprised me -- that no tinkering with arrays, or
>matchtext, or anything else is faster than the most straightforward
>Revolution syntax. I was thinking this would take a long time, but
>in fact it is the fastest way to do it (that I've seen so far,
>anyway.) We've mentioned this on the list before, but I guess I need
>to be hit on the head with the facts occasionally, just to remind me
>how good we've got it.
>Surprise. Rev wins out again.
>Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
I think that the time needed to prepare the text for searching should
be included since it is a required step and for large files can use
enough ticks to alter the results. Best would be to see both the
total time and search-only time.
More information about the use-livecode